In this case, the plaintiff is a collective of mayors challenging the decisions of the Ministry of Environment and of the Ministry of Labour granting a licence authorizing a company to build an open dump in a protected area next to their villages.

The plaintiff complains that the impact on the environment resulting from open dump was not taken into consideration by the ministries of Environment and Labour when they took their decision because no Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was joined to the permit demand. Consequently, the plaintiff challenged the decisions of both the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Labour on the motifs that they were delivered despite the fact that the demands did not respect the environmental procedure because of the absence of EIA and are located in a protected area.

The Tribunal considered that the decision to build an open dump in a protected area does not constitute any irregularity because the construction of the dump is compatible with the objectives of conservation of the nature stated by the law on protected areas. However, the tribunal held that the same law requires that the impact on the environment needs to be assessed, which was not the case here because no environmental impact assessment took place. As a result, the tribunal cancelled the two decisions.

Country: 
Luxembourg
Type of document: 
Reference number: 
13098
Date of entry: 
Fri, 29 April 2016
Date of modification: 
Fri, 29 April 2016
Status: 
Date of text: 
Fri, 29 April 2016
Region: 
Data source: 
Source language: 
French
The accuracy of the information is the responsibility of the contributing source. In case of discrepancies / technical issues the information at the source prevails. Please help us improve this site – report issues here