Aller au contenu principal
Party Signature Ratification État Additional information
17 Jun 2004 Accession
08 Oct 1999 Accession
20 Oct 1992 Accession
26 Jan 2009 Accession Déclarations
17 May 2000 Accession
03 Dec 1992 Accession
22 Mar 1985 18 Jan 1990 Ratification
01 Oct 1999 Accession
16 Sep 1987 Accession
16 Sep 1985 19 Aug 1987 Ratification
12 Jun 1996 Accession
01 Apr 1993 Accession
27 Apr 1990 Accession
02 Aug 1990 Accession
16 Oct 1992 Accession
22 Mar 1985 20 Jun 1986 Acceptance
22 Mar 1985 17 Oct 1988 Ratification
06 Jun 1997 Accession
01 Jul 1993 Accession
23 Aug 2004 Accession
03 Oct 1994 Accession
01 Sep 1993 Succession End notes
04 Dec 1991 Accession
19 Mar 1990 Accession
26 Jul 1990 Accession
20 Nov 1990 Accession
12 Dec 1985 30 Mar 1989 Ratification
06 Jan 1997 Accession
31 Jul 2001 Accession
27 Jun 2001 Accession
30 Aug 1989 Accession
22 Mar 1985 04 Jun 1986 Ratification
29 Mar 1993 Accession
18 May 1989 Accession
22 Mar 1985 06 Mar 1990 Ratification
11 Sep 1989 Accession End notes
16 Jul 1990 Accession
31 Oct 1994 Accession
16 Nov 1994 Accession
22 Dec 2003 Accession
30 Jul 1991 Accession
21 Sep 1992 Succession End notes
14 Jul 1992 Accession
28 May 1992 Accession
30 Sep 1993 Succession End notes
05 Apr 1993 Accession
24 Jan 1995 Accession
30 Nov 1994 Accession
22 Mar 1985 29 Sep 1988 Ratification
30 Jul 1999 Accession
31 Mar 1993 Accession
18 May 1993 Accession
10 Apr 1990 Accession
22 Mar 1985 09 May 1988 Ratification
02 Oct 1992 Accession
17 Aug 1988 Accession
10 Mar 2005 Accession
17 Oct 1996 Accession
10 Nov 1992 Accession
11 Oct 1994 Accession
22 Mar 1985 17 Oct 1988 Approval Déclarations
23 Oct 1989 Accession
22 Mar 1985 26 Sep 1986 Ratification Déclarations
22 Mar 1985 04 Dec 1987 Approval
09 Feb 1994 Accession
25 Jul 1990 Accession
21 Mar 1996 Accession
22 Mar 1985 30 Sep 1988 Ratification End notes
24 Jul 1989 Accession
22 Mar 1985 29 Dec 1988 Ratification
31 Mar 1993 Accession
11 Sep 1987 Accession
25 Jun 1992 Accession
12 Nov 2002 Accession
12 Aug 1993 Accession
29 Mar 2000 Accession
05 May 2008 Accession Déclarations
14 Oct 1993 Accession
04 May 1988 Accession
29 Aug 1989 Accession
18 Mar 1991 Accession
26 Jun 1992 Accession
03 Oct 1990 Accession
25 Jun 2008 Accession
15 Sep 1988 Accession
30 Jun 1992 Accession
22 Mar 1985 19 Sep 1988 Ratification
31 Mar 1993 Accession
30 Sep 1988 Accession
31 May 1989 Accession
26 Aug 1998 Accession
09 Nov 1988 Accession
07 Jan 1993 Accession
23 Nov 1992 Accession
31 May 2000 Accession
21 Aug 1998 Accession
28 Apr 1995 Accession
30 Mar 1993 Accession
25 Mar 1994 Accession
15 Jan 1996 Accession
11 Jul 1990 Accession
08 Feb 1989 Accession
18 Jan 1995 Accession
17 Apr 1985 17 Oct 1988 Ratification
07 Nov 1996 Accession
09 Jan 1991 Accession
29 Aug 1989 Accession
26 Apr 1988 Accession
28 Oct 1994 Accession
15 Sep 1988 Accession
11 Mar 1993 Accession
26 May 1994 Accession
18 Aug 1992 Accession End notes
01 Apr 1985 14 Sep 1987 Ratification
03 Aug 1994 Accession
12 Mar 1993 Accession
07 Mar 1996 Accession
23 Oct 2006 Succession End notes
07 Feb 1986 28 Dec 1995 Ratification
09 Sep 1994 Accession
24 Nov 1993 Accession
20 Sep 1993 Accession
12 Nov 2001 Accession
06 Jul 1994 Accession
22 Mar 1985 28 Sep 1988 Acceptance Déclarations
End notes
21 Mar 1986 02 Jun 1987 Ratification End notes
05 Mar 1993 Accession
09 Oct 1992 Accession
31 Oct 1988 Accession
22 Dec 2003 Accession
10 Mar 1994 Succession End notes
22 Mar 1985 23 Sep 1986 Ratification Déclarations
30 Jun 1999 Accession
18 Dec 1992 Accession
29 May 2001 Accession
13 Feb 1989 Accession
27 Oct 1992 Accession
03 Dec 1992 Accession
22 Mar 1985 07 Apr 1989 Ratification
17 Jul 1991 Accession
13 Jul 1990 Accession
17 Oct 1988 Accession End notes
22 Jan 1996 Accession
27 Feb 1992 Accession
24 Oct 1996 Accession
27 Jan 1993 Accession
22 Mar 1985 18 Jun 1986 Acceptance
11 Oct 2001 Accession
21 Dec 1992 Accession
23 Apr 2009 Accession
19 Nov 2001 Accession
01 Mar 1993 Accession
19 Mar 1993 Accession
12 Mar 2001 Succession End notes
06 Jan 1993 Accession
29 Aug 2001 Accession
05 Jan 1989 Accession
28 May 1993 Succession End notes
06 Jul 1992 Succession End notes
17 Jun 1993 Accession
01 Aug 2001 Accession
15 Jan 1990 Accession
12 Jan 2012 Accession
25 Jul 1988 Accession
15 Dec 1989 Accession
10 Aug 1992 Accession
28 Jul 1993 Accession
02 Dec 1996 Accession
18 Mar 2019 Accession
29 Jan 1993 Accession
14 Oct 1997 Accession
22 Mar 1985 26 Nov 1986 Ratification Déclarations
22 Mar 1985 17 Dec 1987 Ratification
12 Dec 1989 Accession
06 May 1996 Accession
07 Jul 1989 Accession
16 Sep 2009 Accession
25 Feb 1991 Accession
29 Jul 1998 Accession
28 Aug 1989 Accession
25 Sep 1989 Accession
18 Nov 1993 Accession
15 Jul 1993 Accession
20 Sep 1991 Accession
24 Jun 1988 Accession
22 Mar 1985 18 Jun 1986 Acceptance
22 Dec 1989 Accession
20 May 1985 15 May 1987 Ratification End notes
07 Apr 1993 Accession
22 Mar 1985 27 Aug 1986 Ratification
27 Feb 1989 Accession
18 May 1993 Accession
21 Nov 1994 Accession
01 Sep 1988 Accession
26 Jan 1994 Accession
21 Feb 1996 Accession
24 Jan 1990 Accession
03 Nov 1992 Accession

Declarations

Declaration:The Principality of Andorra accepts as compulsory the means of dispute as described in article 11 paragraph 3 (a) of the Convention: the submission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice.
23 May 1989"1. On behalf of the European Community, it is hereby declared that the said Community can accept arbitration as a means of dispute settlement within the terms of the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer.It cannot accept submission of any dispute to the International Court of Justice.""2. According to the customary procedures within the European Community, the Community's financial participation in the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and in the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the Ozone Layer may not involve the Community in expenditure other than administrative costs which may not exceed 2.5% of the total administrative costs."Declaration by the European Economic Community in conformity with Article 13 (3) of the Vienna Convention for the protection of the ozone layer concerning the extent of its competence with respect to the matters covered by the Convention and by the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer: In accordance with the relevant Articles of the EEC Treaty, the Community has competence to take action relating to the preservation, protection and improvement of the quality of the environment.The Community has exercised its competence in the area covered by the Vienna Convention and the Montreal Protocol in adopting Council Decision 80/372/EEC of 26 March 1980 concerning chlorofluorocarbons in the environment (1), Council Decision 82/795/EEC of 15 November 1982 on the consolidation of precautionary measures concerning chlorofluorocarbons in the environment (2) and Council Regulation (EEC) N˚ 3322/88 of 14 October 1988 on certain chlorofluorocarbons and halons which deplete the ozone layer. The Community may well exercise its competence in the future by adopting further legislation in this area.In the field of research in the environment, as referred to by the Convention, the Community has a certain competence by virtue of Council Decision 86/234/EC of 10 June 1986 adopting multiannual R& D programmes in the field of the environment (1986 to 1990).(1) OJ N˚ L 90, 3. 4. 1980, p. 45.(2) OJ N˚ L 329, 25. 11. 1982, p. 29.
"With respect to article 11, paragraph 3 of the Convention Finland declares that it accepts both of the said means of dispute settlement as compulsory."
Declaration:“In acceding to the Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, as well as its four Amendments: London (1990), Copenhagen (1992), Montreal (1997) and Beijing (1999), the Holy See desires to encourage the entire International Community to be resolute in promoting authentic cooperation between politics, science and economics. Such cooperation, as has been shown in the case of the ozone regime, can achieve important outcomes, which make it simultaneously possible to safeguard creation, to promote integral human development and to care for the common good, in a spirit of responsible solidarity and with profound positive repercussions for present and future generations.In conformity with its own nature and with the particular character of Vatican City State, the Holy See, by means of the solemn act of accession, intends to give its own moral support to the commitment of States to the correct and effective implementation of the Treaties in question and to the attaining of the mentioned objectives. To this end, it expresses the wish that by recognizing ‘the signs of [an economic growth] that has not always been able to protect the delicate balances of nature’ (Homily of Pope Benedict XVI at Loreto, 2 September 2007), all actors will intensify the aforesaid cooperation and strengthen ‘the alliance between man and the environment, which must mirror the creative love of God, from whom we come and to whom we are bound’(Benedict XVI, After the Angelus, 16 September 2007).”
Declaration:"In accordance with article 11, paragraph 3, of the Conven- tion the Kingdom of the Netherlands accepts for a dispute not resolved in accordance with paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of article 11 of the above-mentioned Convention, both of the following means of dispute settlement as compulsory:(a) Arbitration in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its first ordinary meeting;(b) Submission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice."
"Norway accepts the means of dispute settlement as described in art. 11, para 3 ( a ) and ( b ) of the Convention as compulsory, that is a ) arbitration in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its first ordinary meeting, or b ) submission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice."
"Sweden accepts the following means of dispute settlement as compulsory:Submission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice [article 11, paragraph 3 ( b )]It is, however, the intention of the Swedish Government to accept also the following means of dispute settlement as com-pulsory:Arbitration in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its first ordinary meeting [article 11, paragraph 3 ( a )].A declaration in this latter respect will, however, not be given until the procedures for arbitration have been adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its first ordinary meeting."

End Notes

The former Yugoslavia had acceeded to the Convention on 16 April 1990. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Croatia”, “former Yugoslavia”, “Slovenia”, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and “Yugoslavia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

On 15 February 1994, the Secretary-General received from the Government of Portugal a notification to the effect that it shall extend the Convention to Macao. Subsequently, the Secretary-General received communications concerning the status of Macao from the Governments of the Portugal and China (see also note 3 under “China” and note 1 under “Portugal” regarding Macao in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume). Upon resuming the exercise of sovereignty over Macao, China notified the Secretary-General that the Convention will also apply to the Macao Special Administrative Region.

The former Yugoslavia had acceeded to the Convention on 16 April 1990. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Croatia”, “former Yugoslavia”, “Slovenia”, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and “Yugoslavia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

Czechoslovakia had acceded to the Convention on 1 October 1990. See also note 1 under “Czech Republic” and note 1 under “Slovakia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

See note 1 under “Germany” regarding Berlin (West) in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

On 9 January 2020, the Secretary-General received a communication from the Government of Mauritius relating to the Chagos Archipelago.

See C.N.47.2020.TREATIES-XXVII.2 of 31 January 2020 for the text of the above-mentioned communication.

See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.

For the Kingdom in Europe, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.

The instrument of ratification indicates that in accordance with the special relationship which exists between New Zealand and the Cook Islands and between New Zealand and Niue, there have been consultations regarding the Convention between the Government of New Zealand and the Government of Cook Islands and between the Government of New Zealand and the Government of Niue; that the Government of the Cook Islands, which has exclusive competence to implement treaties in the Cook Islands, has requested that the Convention should extend to the Cook Islands; that the Government of Niue which has exclusive competence to implement treaties in Niue, has requested that the Convention should extend to Niue. The said instrument specifies that accordingly the Convention shall apply also to the Cook Islands and Niue.

In this regard, on 17 March 2004, the Secretary-General received from the Government of New Zealand, the following communcations:In respect of the Cook Islands:

"... the Government of New Zealand ratified the Convention on 2 June 1987;

... the Government of New Zealand declared, on ratification, that its ratification extended to the Cook Islands;

... the Cook Islands is a self-governing State in a relationship of free association with New Zealand, and possesses in its own right the capacity to enter into treaties and other international agreements with governments and regional and international organisations;

... the Government of the Cook Islands acceded to the Convention in its own right on 22 December 2003;

... the Government of New Zealand declares that, by reason of the accession to the Convention by the Government of the Cook Islands, it regards the Government of Cook Islands as having succeeded to the obligations under the Convention of the Government of New Zealand in respect of the Cook Islands,

... [the Government of New Zealand] declares that, accordingly, as from the date of the accession to the Convention by the Government of the Cook Islands, theernment of New Zealand ceased to have State responsibility for the observance of the obligations under the Convention in respect of the Cook Islands."

In respect of Niue:

"... the Government of New Zealand ratified the Convention on 2 June 1987;

... the Government of New Zealand declared, on ratification, that its ratification extended to Niue;

... Niue is a self-governing State in a relationship of free association with New Zealand, and possesses in its own right the capacity to enter into treaties and other international agreements with governments and regional and international organisations;

... the Government of Niue acceded to the Convention in its own right on 22 December 2003;

... the Government of New Zealand declares that, by reason of the accession to the Convention by the Government of Niue, it regards the Government of Niue as having succeeded to the obligations under the Convention of the Government of New Zealand in respect of Niue,

... [the Government of New Zealand] further declares that, accordingly, as from the date of the accession to the Convention by the Government of Niue, the Government of New Zealand ceased to have State responsibility for the observance of the obligations under the Convention in respect of the territory of Niue."

See also notes 1 under “Cook Islands” and “Niue” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

The former Yugoslavia had acceeded to the Convention on 16 April 1990. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Croatia”, “former Yugoslavia”, “Slovenia”, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and “Yugoslavia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

On 15 February 1994, the Secretary-General received from the Government of Portugal a notification to the effect that it shall extend the Convention to Macao. Subsequently, the Secretary-General received communications concerning the status of Macao from the Governments of the Portugal and China (see also note 3 under “China” and note 1 under “Portugal” regarding Macao in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume). Upon resuming the exercise of sovereignty over Macao, China notified the Secretary-General that the Convention will also apply to the Macao Special Administrative Region.

The former Yugoslavia had acceeded to the Convention on 16 April 1990. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Croatia”, “former Yugoslavia”, “Slovenia”, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and “Yugoslavia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

Czechoslovakia had acceded to the Convention on 1 October 1990. See also note 1 under “Czech Republic” and note 1 under “Slovakia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

The former Yugoslavia had acceeded to the Convention on 16 April 1990. See also note 1 under “Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Croatia”, “former Yugoslavia”, “Slovenia”, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and “Yugoslavia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume.

On 6 and 10 June 1997, the Secretary-General received communications concerning the status of Hong Kong from the Governments of the United Kingdom and China (see also note 2 under “China” and note 2 under “United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland” regarding Hong Kong in the “Historical Information” section in the front matter of this volume). Upon resuming the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong, China notified the Secretary-General that the Convention with the reservation made by China will also apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Displaying 1 - 198 of 198