Back to meeting

Refinements to the modus operandi of the Scientific & Technical Review Panel (STRP)

Repealed

This is a machine-readable version, original documents can be found in the History tab.

Table of Contents

  1. Paragraph 1.
  2. Paragraph 2.
  3. Paragraph 3.
  4. Paragraph 4.
  5. Paragraph 5.
  6. Paragraph 6.
  7. Paragraph 7.
  8. Paragraph 8.
  9. Paragraph 9.
  10. Paragraph 10.
  11. Paragraph 11.
  12. Paragraph 12.
  13. Paragraph 13.
  14. Paragraph 14.
  15. Paragraph 15.
  16. Paragraph 16.
  17. Paragraph 17.
  18. Paragraph 18.
  19. Paragraph 19.
  20. Paragraph 20.
  21. Paragraph 21.
  22. Paragraph 22.
  23. Paragraph 23.
  24. Paragraph 24.

Refinements to the modus operandi of the Scientific & Technical Review Panel (STRP)

1.RECALLING the establishment by Resolution 5.5 (1993) of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP), which was to be made up of members with appropriate scientific and technical knowledge, appointed by the Conference of the Contracting Parties (COP), but participating as individuals and not as representatives of their countries of origin;
2.ALSO RECALLING Resolutions VI.7, VII.2, VIII.28 and IX.11 on this matter, which made successive modifications in the way in which the STRP and its work were organized;
3.THANKING members of the STRP and its observer organizations and invited experts for their contributions since COP9 and for their expert advice on numerous scientific and technical issues important for implementation of the Convention, including the new and revised guidelines and reports provided to this meeting of the Conference as the Annexes to Resolutions X.14 to X.21 and others being prepared as Ramsar Technical Reports;
4.ALSO THANKING the government of Sweden for its financial contributions in support of the substantive work of the STRP during 2006-2008, and BirdLife International, the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC–UK) for their in-kind support to the work of the Panel;
5.WELCOMING the fact that the STRP has indicated that its revised modus operandi for the 2006-2008 triennium, with the budget provided for its work by Resolution IX.12 (2005), has enabled the Panel to develop and deliver its work plan and required tasks with increased capacity, efficiency, and timeliness;
6.RE-EMPHASIZING the need to continue establishing closer links between the STRP and the network of scientists and experts in each Contracting Party, so that the Convention may benefit from the array of existing knowledge and experience, but CONCERNED that the STRP has reported continuing difficulties in establishing effective contact and working relationships with many STRP National Focal Points;
7.THANKING the government of Austria for its initiative in calling and hosting an intersessional meeting for European STRP National Focal Points, and NOTING that the recommendations from that meeting have been taken into account in the refinements to the STRP modus operandi annexed to this Resolution and in the revised Terms of Reference for STRP National Focal Points;
8.RECOGNIZING the importance for the STRP to work in partnership with the scientific and technical bodies of the conventions and programmes with which Memoranda of Cooperation and/or joint work plans are in place, namely the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on Migratory Species, the Convention to Combat Desertification, the World Heritage Convention, the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Programme, and other conventions and agreements;
9.ALSO RECOGNIZING the need for continuing cooperation between the STRP and a number of expert networks, specialist groups and societies that exist, some in association with the official International Organization Partners of the Convention; and
10.FURTHER RECOGNIZING that the high priorities for the work of the STRP for 2009-2012 are identified in the Annexes to Resolution X.10 on Future implementation of the scientific and technical aspects of the Convention;
The Conference of the Contracting Parties
11.REAFFIRMS the critical importance to the Convention of the work and advice of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP) in providing reliable guidance to the Conference of the Contracting Parties for the Parties’ implementation of the Convention;
12.CONFIRMS that the modus operandi for the STRP adopted by Resolution IX.11 (2005) shall, with the refinements listed in the annex to this Resolution, apply for the 2009-2012 period and for subsequent periods unless further amended by COP decisions;
13.AGREES that thematic expert members shall be appointed to the Panel by the STRP Oversight Committee for the following areas of priority STRP work for the 2009-2012 period, to lead implementation of priority work areas for the Panel as set out in the Annex to Resolution X.10:Wetland inventory, assessment and indicatorsRamsar site designationWetland restoration and managementWetlands and climate changeWetlands and human healthWetlands and water resourcesWetlands and agricultureCEPA
14.AGREES that in other work areas indicated in the Annexes to Resolution X.10, the Panel shall seek additional expertise as and when required through various means, including through collaboration with the scientific advisory bodies of other international conventions and agencies, and through the International Organization Partners, STRP invited observers, and STRP invited experts;
15.CONFIRMS that the Standing Committee will continue to have overall responsibility for the work of the STRP, that the Chair of the STRP will report to each Standing Committee meeting on the Panel’s progress with its programme of work and priorities as established by the COP (Resolution X.10) and Standing Committee, and that the STRP will report to Standing Committee on any adjustments to its programme it considers necessary and on new tasks proposed during the intersessional period in relation to emerging issues;
16.ALSO CONFIRMS that the STRP support functions will continue to be provided during the 2009-2012 period from the Ramsar Secretariat;
17.RECOGNIZES the continuing need to ensure both that the Panel is provided with the necessary resources to undertake its work effectively and that the Ramsar Secretariat has sufficient capacity to support this work, and URGES Contracting Parties and others to contribute to securing continuity of such funding;
18.REVISES the existing list of bodies and organizations invited to participate as observers in the meetings of the STRP and INVITES the following bodies and organizations to consider establishing close working cooperative arrangements with the STRP on matters of common interest:the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)the Scientific Council of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS)the Committee on Science and Technology of the Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)the Subsidiary Body on Scientific and Technical Advice of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)the Secretariats of the CBD, CMS, CITES, UNCCD, UNFCCC, the World Heritage Convention (WHC); UNESCO – Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB), the UNECE "Water Convention" and the Antarctic Treatythe Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)the UNEP – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)the World Health Organization (WHO)the Society of Wetland Scientists (SWS)the Coordinating Committee for the Guidelines for Global Action on Peatlands (GGAP-CoCo)the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA)the International Network of Basin Organizations (INBO)The Nature Conservancy (TNC)Ducks Unlimited (DU)the Global Water Partnership (GWP)the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT)the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER)the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE)the European Space Agency – ESRIN (ESA-ESRIN)the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
19.URGES Contracting Parties to ensure that the persons they appoint as their STRP National Focal Point are appropriately qualified for this role as defined in the Terms of Reference provided as the appendix to this Resolution; that their STRP National Focal Points have contact with national experts relevant to the work areas of the Panel; that their STRP National Focal Points are involved in all Ramsar processes within the Contracting Party (including participating in any National Ramsar or Wetland Committee); and that the contact information for their STRP National Focal Points are kept up-to-date and functional;
20.ALSO URGES the 17 Contracting Parties1 that have not thus far appointed an STRP National Focal Point to do so without delay, taking into account the Terms of Reference for STRP National Focal Points in the appendix to this Resolution;1As at 4 November 2008: Antigua and Barbuda, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belize, Dijbouti, Finland, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malta, Nepal, Nigeria, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay and South Africa.
21.FURTHER URGES those Contracting Parties that have designated their STRP National Focal Point to review the skills and capacity of that person in relation to the Terms of Reference for STRP National Focal Points in the annex to this Resolution and, as appropriate, determine if an alternative appointment should be made, and if so to advise the Secretariat accordingly;
22.REQUESTS the STRP, working with the STRP National Focal Points, to consider mechanisms for identifying task-based national expert contacts to undertake a) participation in specialist work on specific STRP tasks and b) review of draft documents;
23.REQUESTS the STRP and Secretariat to identify opportunities and mechanisms for holding intersessional regional or subregional meetings of STRP National Focal Points; and
24.EMPHASIZES the value of participation by STRP members in meetings of the COP and Standing Committee and REQUESTS Contracting Parties, the Standing Committee, and the Secretariat to seek to secure any additional funding that might be necessary for this purpose.

Annex

The modus operandi of the Scientific & Technical Review Panel

I. Key objective of the STRP modus operandi

1.The key objective of this modus operandi is to establish ways and means of ensuring that the STRP mechanism delivers the best available scientific and technical advice to the Convention, in the most efficient and cost-effective manner, through the work of widely recognized wetland conservation and wise use experts and networks.

II. Establishment and responsibilities of the STRP Oversight Committee

2.The STRP Oversight Committee will report to the Standing Committee and will be composed of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Standing Committee, the Chair and Vice Chair of the STRP, and the Secretary General and the Deputy Secretary General ex officio. The Oversight Committee will be chaired by the Chair of Standing Committee.
3.The responsibilities of the STRP Oversight Committee are to:
i)appoint the members, Chair and Vice Chair of the STRP;
ii)provide intersessional advice, guidance and support to the operations and work of the Panel;
iii)keep under review, and advise the Standing Committee on, the operations of the Panel under this revised modus operandi; and
iv)provide advice to the Secretariat on expenditures under the STRP budget line.
4.The Standing Committee continues to have overall responsibility for the work of the STRP, and the Chair of the STRP will report to each Standing Committee meeting on progress with the STRP programme of work and priorities as established by the COP and Standing Committee.

III. Criteria and characteristics of candidate STRP members

5.Candidates for appointment as members of the STRP must have the following:
i)demonstrated capacity for networking with wetland conservation and wise use experts at local, national and international scales2, and demonstrated engagement in such expert networks; and/or2Note that access to such networks is also one of the key purposes of the standing membership on the STRP of the Convention’s International Organization Partners and the invitation to relevant scientific and technical organizations to participate as observers to the Panel.
ii)widely recognized experience and expertise in one or more aspects of wetland conservation and wise use, particularly those relevant to the priority work areas and tasks identified by the COP for the forthcoming work of the Panel;
iii)experience of working with wetland experts at local, regional and national levels, including, when appropriate, STRP National Focal Points;
iv)full access to electronic mail and Web-based information and communication systems, through which the intersessional work of the Panel will take place;
v)full fluency in understanding, and fluent written and oral communication in, English (which remains the working language of the Panel); and
vi)commitment to undertake the work required of the Panel and its Working Groups with the support, where relevant, of the member’s organization or institution.

IV. Composition of the Panel

6.One Panel member shall be appointed from each Ramsar region. These members shall have experience with, and access to, networks of wetlands experts (at local, regional and/or international scales).
7.Further Panel members shall be appointed as wetlands experts with recognized experience and expertise in aspects of wetland conservation and wise use relevant to the priority thematic work areas of the Panel. The areas of thematic expertise required for each triennium will be approved through an operative paragraph of a COP Resolution. For these members, regional balance will be sought, with appointed members based in different Ramsar countries or regions and/or from northern and southern parts of the world. Gender balance will also be sought.
8.One additional member will be appointed with expertise in Communications, Education & Public Awareness (CEPA), with the role of providing input to all stages of the Panel’s work on each task, from scoping the needs of the identified users to the finalization of outputs, drawing inter alia on the Convention’s CEPA networks and those of the Convention’s International Organisation Partners (IOPs).
9.In recognition of their ongoing scientific and technical support for the Convention, each of the Convention’s International Organization Partners (IOPs) will continue to be a member of the Panel. So as to ensure continuity of representation throughout STRP processes and meetings during and between inter-COP periods, each IOP will be requested to nominate its representative on the Panel, and this nomination will be considered and confirmed by the STRP Oversight Committee as part of their Panel appointment role. Such IOP nominees should be wetland experts and have a role within their IOPs for maintaining and accessing the wetland conservation and wise use expertise of their organization’s regional and global networks.
10.The appointed members will lead (or co-lead) the STRP’s Working Groups (see below) responsible for delivering the COP-approved tasks on these themes – they will oversee the work of any task forces established within a Working Group to deliver a specific priority task, and should be prepared to undertake such a role.
11.The thematic work areas for which Panel members will be appointed will be reviewed for each inter-COP period and will be approved by the COP. The thematic work areas will depend on the priority themes and tasks identified by the Standing Committee and COP for the STRP in the next period.
12.The schedule of Panel meetings will be confirmed by the STRP Oversight Committee and may include up to two plenary meetings between COPs, one meeting not later than six months after the previous COP and the other not later than six months before the next COP.

V. Procedure for identification and appointment of candidates

13.Appointments for each inter-COP period will be made by the STRP Oversight Committee.
14.Nominations of candidates for appointment will be invited from:
i)the Convention’s national Administrative Authorities;
ii)STRP National Focal Points (in consultation with their Administrative Authority);
iii)the current Chair and Vice Chair of the STRP; and
iv)current STRP members and observers.
15.Nominations can include existing appointed STRP members, observers, and invited experts if they have a proven track record of expert contribution to the work of the Panel. Appointment of such experts to the Panel will ensure continuity in the Panel’s work on ongoing thematic work areas.
16.Nominations are not restricted to people from the same country of origin as the nominator, since it is networking capacity and/or relevant expertise that is sought, regardless of the nationality or country of current domicile of the expert.
17.The nominator of each candidate will provide the Oversight Committee with a short summary of the expertise and experience of the candidate and the relevance of this to the work of the Panel for the given period, in the form of a letter of recommendation.
18.Candidates being nominated will provide a declaration that they are willing to be considered for appointment to the Panel, that they have the full support of their organizations or institutions to deliver the work expected of Panel members, including time and availability for meetings, and that they have the necessary English language skills to engage fully in the work of the Panel; they will note whether they will need financial support to participate in meetings and will provide a brief summary of how they see their skills and expertise contributing to the Panel’s work, along with a curriculum vitae.
19.On the basis of the nominations received, the Secretariat will prepare an assessment and recommendations for appointments for consideration by the STRP Oversight Committee, which will reach its decisions on appointments through electronic communication and teleconferences as soon as possible after each COP, in order to permit the Panel to initiate its new programme of work as early as possible.
20.In the event that a vacancy for a member of the Panel arises between COPs, the STRP Oversight Committee will review other nominees and appoint a replacement member as soon as practicable.

VI. Appointment of Chair and Vice Chair of the Panel

21.The Chairperson of the Panel will be appointed by the STRP Oversight Committee as a supernumary post (i.e., additional to the appointments of regional and thematic expert members). The Chairperson must have broad knowledge of wetland issues and be familiar with the work of the Panel and the Convention. The Chairperson will lead the Panel’s thematic work on strategic and emerging issues and future priorities.
22.The Vice Chairperson will be appointed from amongst the appointed members to the Panel. The Vice Chairperson will lead the Panel’s thematic work on regional networking.
23.The outgoing STRP Chair and Vice Chair will excuse themselves from the STRP Oversight Committee decisions concerning these appointments.

VII. STRP observer organizations

24.The work of the Panel will continue to benefit from the involvement and input of other relevant scientific and technical organizations and their networks, invited by the COP as observers to the Panel. Each organization invited by the COP as an observer to the STRP will be requested to nominate its representative on the Panel, in order to ensure continuity of participation. The representative should have the capacity to access his or her organization’s national, regional and international network of wetland experts. In order to continue contributing to the efforts to streamline and harmonize the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements, invited observers to the STRP will continue to include the chairs of the equivalent scientific and technical subsidiary bodies and relevant staff of the secretariats of other environmental conventions and agreements.

VIII. Establishment and operation of Working Groups and task forces

25.The appointed STRP members will, where appropriate and with the assistance of the Secretariat’s STRP support, establish Working Groups at the start of the inter-COP period and will act as their leads or co-leads to develop and progress the tasks requested by the COP.
26.Membership of any Working Group will be established by its lead or co-leads, with the advice of the STRP Chair and Vice-Chair and the Secretariat. Membership may include inter alia other appointed STRP members, representatives of STRP observer organizations, STRP National Focal Points with relevant expertise, and other invited experts with relevant expertise.
27.As part of the Panel’s work in its strategic review function on emerging issues and related matters, the Chairperson will coordinate the Panel’s advice to the next COP concerning high and emerging priorities for its work in the next period.
28.Each Working Group will develop the scope and contents of any advice, guideline, review or other output requested by COP within its thematic work area as a high priority for the inter-COP period; will identify the mechanism for its delivery (including through an expert consultancy contract if necessary and resources permitting); and will oversee and review progress in the drafting and finalization of such materials.
29.As soon as possible after his or her appointment, the Working Group lead or co-leads will establish the initial membership of her or his Working Group and will undertake initial scoping work for undertaking each of the high priority tasks, for circulation in advance of, and discussion during, the first plenary meeting of the Panel following a COP.
30.When appropriate, a Working Group or the Chairperson can establish a small task force for the delivery of a particular high priority task in the STRP’s programme for the period.
31.Each Working Group will keep under review opportunities for initiating other tasks requested of the Panel within its thematic work area, and will develop mechanisms for the delivery of any such tasks as and when capacity permits. If opportunity arises to initiate new tasks between COPs, the Chair of the Panel will seek the advice of the STRP Oversight Committee about establishing appropriate ways and means of developing this work.
32.Each Working Group will work largely electronically (through e-mail, the Web-based STRP Support Service mechanism, and teleconferences) but will, resources permitting, meet in a workshop at least once during the inter-COP period, in order to progress its work efficiently.

IX. Ensuring continuing national and regional applicability in the work of the STRP

33.One key to ensuring full national and regional input to the STRP’s work is the continuing activation of the network of STRP National Focal Points (NFPs) appointed by each Contracting Party. A revised Terms of Reference and skills profile for STRP NFPs is provided as the appendix to this modus operandi.
34.The Secretariat will support the development of the STRP National Focal Point network through identification of the expertise and capacity needs of STRP National Focal Points, including seeking ways and means of supporting their development of national networks.
35.The Secretariat and STRP will identify opportunities and mechanisms for holding intersessional regional or subregional meetings of STRP National Focal Points;
36.A second aspect of ensuring regional input to, and relevance of, the STRP is to have as part of its mandate the task of responding to regional scientific and technical priorities. In doing so, the STRP will consult with Contracting Parties through their STRP National Focal Points. The Panel will continue to develop mechanisms for the delivery of this aspect of its work, which may include inter alia responding to regional scientific and technical priorities identified by Ramsar regional meetings and those identified by regional initiatives operating by COP decision under the framework of the Convention (Resolution X.6).

X. Continuity of Panel membership

37.In order to ensure continuity of expertise and working practices, a minimum of one-third of the appointed members of the STRP should be reappointed for a second term, as appropriate.
38.The Chair of the STRP, following appropriate consultations with current members, will recommend to the STRP Oversight Committee the names of those members who should be considered for reappointment, on the basis of their contributions to the work of the Panel and the relevance of their areas of expertise to the priority tasks assigned to the Panel by COP.
39.Members being proposed for reappointment must have demonstrated a capability of contributing effectively to the work of the Panel and have confirmed their willingness to be reappointed.

Appendix

Terms of Reference for STRP National Focal Points

1.The Ramsar Administrative Authority for the Contracting Party is responsible for ensuring:
i)the appointment of that Party’s STRP National Focal Point (NFP);
ii)that the STRP NFP is appropriately qualified for this role as defined in this Terms of Reference, and that the Secretariat and STRP are provided with information on this in line with the STRP NFP expertise, skills and capacity profile provided in this Terms of Reference;
iii)that the STRP NFP has contact with national experts relevant to the work areas of the Panel;
iv)that the STRP NFP is involved in relevant Ramsar processes within the Contracting Party (including participating in any National Ramsar or Wetland Committee); and
v)that the contact information for the STRP NFP is notified to the STRP through the Ramsar Secretariat, and that it is kept up-to-date and functional.
2.The main function of the STRP NFP in each country is to provide input and support to the implementation of the Work Plan of the STRP, as approved by the first full meeting of the Standing Committee that follows each COP.
3.An STRP NFP is a person appointed to the role in his or her own right for their scientific and technical expertise in wetland conservation and wise use issues, and he or she does not act to represent any organization or government in the work of the STRP.
4.In order to undertake their work, the STRP NFPs should maintain regular contact and communication with the other Ramsar NFPs (Administrative Authority and the CEPA Focal Points) in their country and, as much as possible, with other STRP NFPs in the region.
5.The STRP NFP should, to the extent possible, consult with and seek input from other experts, expert bodies and wetland centres in his/her country. In this regard, the NFP should mobilize local capacity at the country level, e.g., through the establishment of a Ramsar/wetland scientific and technical committee.
6.The STRP NFPs can identify and recommend other people in their countries who have the specialist expertise and experience to participate in a thematic work area of the STRP. Additionally, the NFPs are encouraged to provide information to the STRP on local or national initiatives that are relevant to the STRP’s work.
7.The NFPs are encouraged to use the opportunities of suitable national meetings, newsletters, e-mail, etc., to canvas the views of the expert community and, when feasible, to organize expert consultations on key issues in the STRP Work Plan. The latter should be done in coordination with the appropriate regional networking member of the STRP or relevant thematic Working Group Lead.
8.STRP NFPs in each country are expected to maintain regular contact, and endeavour to identify and undertake activities of common interest, with their equivalent National Focal Points of the technical and scientific bodies of other relevant international and regional environment-related Conventions, and especially for those with which the Ramsar Convention has in place a Memorandum of Cooperation or Understanding, namely, the Conventions on Biological Diversity, Desertification, Migratory Species, and World Heritage.
9.The STRP NFPs are also expected to be involved in the monitoring and evaluation of projects funded under the Ramsar Small Grants Fund for Wetland Conservation and Wise Use (SGF), as may be required by the Ramsar Administrative Authority in each country and/or the agency implementing the project.
10.The National Focal Points should take an active role in supporting national wetland inventory activities and in supporting the efforts of their Contracting Parties to implement the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance.
11.The STRP NFPs should provide advice to, and participate in, meetings of the National Wetland/Ramsar Committee or similar bodies (e.g., National Biodiversity Committees) where they exist, and provide advice in the preparation of National Reports to Conferences of Contracting Parties. They should also assist in disseminating information on the work of the STRP, interpreted as appropriate to the national context, to relevant individuals and bodies in their countries.
12.The input of the STRP NFPs should be channeled, by preference, through the STRP member leading each thematic area of the Work Plan or through the appropriate regional networking member of the STRP. When this is not practical, the input of the NFP may also be channeled through the appropriate Senior Regional Advisor within the Ramsar Secretariat.
13.In general, the STRP network of NFPs will operate through correspondence and as much as possible through e-mail and the Web-based STRP Support Service. To this effect, the Ramsar Secretariat will include the NFPs with access to e-mail connections to any list-server devoted to STRP members. In addition, the Secretariat has created a dedicated section of the STRP Support Service Web site for the presentation and consideration of STRP matters.
14.As, due to financial limitations, the main working language of the STRP and its network of NFPs is English, the NFP is required to be suitably proficient in the English language, especially written English.
15.STRP NFPs will provide the STRP and Ramsar Secretariat with information concerning their thematic areas of wetland conservation and wise use interest and expertise (though a short questionnaire) and the STRP Working Groups in which they wish directly to participate;
16.STRP NFPs are provided with full access to the Web-based STRP Support Service mechanism so that they may have input to all stages of the Panel’s work, including the development of the scope of delivery of each priority task, the review of draft materials as they are prepared by the Working Groups and task forces, and contribution to the peer review of reports and other documents being considered for publication in the Ramsar Technical Report series.

An expertise, skills and capacity profile for STRP NFPs

17.For consideration for appointment by their Contracting Party Administrative Authority, an STRP NFP should have:
i)a good understanding of national/regional issues and priorities concerning water and wetlands;
ii)a demonstrated capacity for networking with wetland conservation and wise use experts at local and national scales (and international scale if appropriate), demonstrated engagement in such networks, and ability to facilitate consensus among people with different backgrounds (e.g., scientists, government and NGO sector);
iii)widely recognized experience and expertise within his or her country in one or more aspects of wetland conservation and wise use, particularly those relevant to the priority work areas and tasks identified by the COP for the forthcoming work of the STRP;
iv)experience of working with wetland experts at local to national levels, and facilitating discussions and coordinating and consolidating review responses on science-based documents;
v)full access to electronic mail and Web-based information and communication systems, through which the intersessional work of the STRP will take place;
vi)full fluency in understanding, and fluency in reading and writing, English (which remains the working language of the STRP); and
vii)full commitment and the time necessary to undertake the work required of the STRP NFP, and with the support, where relevant, of the NFP’s organization or institution.
18.When a Contracting Party appoints a new STRP NFP, or reaffirms the appointment of an existing STRP NFP, the Party should provide to the Secretariat information on the expertise, skills and capacity of their STRP NFP in relation to the criteria listed in paragraph 17 above.