Aller au contenu principal
Titre:
Henry v. EPA
Party:
Guyana
Région:
Amérique latine et Caraïbes
Date of text:
janvier 01, 2022
Données de base:
Sabin Center
Court name:
Supreme Court
Numéro de référence :
2021-HC-DEM-CIV-FDA
Résumé:
In February 2022, three Guyanese citizens (Sinikka Henry, a lecturer at the University of Guyana, Sherlina Nageer, and Andriska Thorington, students at the University of Guyana) filed suit alleging that the Guyanese Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to grant a modified environmental permit to Esso violated Guyanese environmental laws, where the modified permit allows Esso/ExxonMobil to flare gas in exchange for paying a fee. The plaintiffs seek several Court Orders, including quashing the EPA’s decision to grant the modified permit, and ordering the EPA to issue reports on Esso’s activities, failures to uphold environmental provisions in the permit, and the emissions impacts of Esso’s operations.

Key environmental legal questions:

Whether Guyana’s Environmental Protection Agency’s issuing of an oil exploration permit violates Guyanese environmental laws.
Notes:
Suits against governments; Natural resource extraction; GHG emissions reduction and trading; Other; Access to information; Environmental assessment and permitting